Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming sites, where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. Whenever working with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this is certainly one worker who keeps his equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just stepped in very calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is a bit more terrifying, while the axe was wielded maybe not during the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he don’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant because of the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of cash,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst each and every of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is associated with the idea that neighboring communities will be affected by casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, was one of a handful of prospects whom have recommended that most of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, for example.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it might have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance for three brand new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate compensation, with arbitration required in the event that casinos and neighborhood governments can’t arrived at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. In other terms, the casino might have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the complete city in an effort to be authorized.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by their state because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading recreations betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one associated with the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large numbers of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there is concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and cash advance organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
But, fighting back the corner associated with Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in royal vegas bonus codes accordance aided by the rules and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for company, as well as for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is no longer mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be looking to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this kind of hard stance against the spread of the industry in his local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season their office was accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to show comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.